New project output by Adam Carter and Orestis Palermos in the Journal of the American Philosophical Association: The Ethics of Extended Cognition: Is Having Your Computer Compromised a Personal Assault?

Abstract: Philosophy of mind and cognitive science (e.g., Clark and Chalmers 1998; Clark 2010; Palermos 2014) have recently become increasingly receptive to the hypothesis of extended cognition, according to which external artifacts such as our laptops and smartphones can—under appropriate circumstances—feature as material realisers of a person’s cognitive processes. We argue that, to the extent that the hypothesis of extended cognition is correct, our legal and ethical theorising and practice must be updated, by broadening our conception of personal assault so as to include intentional harm towards gadgets that have been appropriately integrated. We next situate the theoretical case for extended personal assault within the context of some recent ethical and legal cases and close with some critical discussion.

To access the full paper, click on the following link:

The Ethics of Extended Cognition: Is Having Your Computer Compromised a Personal Assault?